Current Issue
News of the Wild
Calendar
Into the Wild
Back Issues
Subscriptions
Advertising
Links

 

 

MORE NEWS

Isolated Wetlands Need Protection Now

Navy and IDNR Set Up New Sanctuary to Protect Rare Nesting Terns

New Vision for Wolf Lake Shared by Illinois and Indiana Conservationists

Spring Burn Season: A Small Number of Good Burns

Highland Park Wrestles with Need for Deer Control

Lake County Acquires Two New Forest Preserves

Fire-loving Fungi Benefit from Restoration with Burning

How Should Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie Be Managed?

Burning in the Oak Woods Brings Back Savanna and Prairie

Chicago Wilderness Welcomes Seven New Members

Indiana Legislators Turn Down Native Fire Pink as State Flower

Wellness Checks for Aquatic Communities

This Year's Conservation and Reinvestment Act (CARA) Legislation

Maintaining Water Levels Helps Calumet-area Night Herons

New Academy for Nature and Culture: Guiding the Next Generation of Restoration Ecologists

Looking at Prairies From Space

New Cook County Restoration Projects Get CorLands Funds

Free, Easy-to-Read Brochures Explain "Issues in Ecology"

 

Summer 2001

News of the Wild —> Back to main page

Isolated Wetlands Need Protection Now

Forward and quick thinkers could help save some of the thousands of isolated wetlands in Chicago Wilderness that recently lost federal protection (See "Supreme Court Overrules Clean Water Act Protection," CW, Spring 2001). DuPage County has a unique ordinance already in place to protect these wetlands. Now, Lake and Kane County officials are working to strengthen their wetland ordinances. These officials understand how important wetlands are for flood and pollution control as well as habitat for wildlife.

A Supreme Court decision in January allowing an isolated wetland to be destroyed to create a landfill in Bartlett, Illinois, opened the door for many more isolated wetlands to be disturbed or destroyed. Lake County alone could lose protection of nearly 7,000 acres of wetlands. And while the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and other federal agencies are still hammering out a workable definition for "isolated wetland," an estimated 30 to 60 percent of the nation’s wetlands have lost protection because of the Supreme Court ruling.

"We've looked at all the best available information to determine to what extent isolated wetlands make up the landscape, and we found that Lake County contains thousands of isolated wetlands," says Ward Miller, executive director of the Lake County Stormwater Management Commission. "Lake County may begin to see more flooding, poorer water quality, and decreased natural habitat if these are allowed to be filled in or further disturbed without some kind of mitigation."

Mitigation is one way to protect wetlands. Under the Clean Water Act, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has the authority to deny or grant permits to owners of wetlands who wanted to fill them in. If the permit is granted, the owner has to recreate (mitigate) wetlands at least as large as those disturbed or pay for wetlands to be restored elsewhere.

Several years ago, the Army Corps denied a permit for the Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County (SWANCC) to create a garbage dump or balefill in Bartlett, where more than 100 great blue herons nest. SWANCC took its fight all the way to the Supreme Court and won.

"While the true significance of this ruling may not be known for some time in the Chicago Wilderness region, we do know that the destruction of our isolated wetlands will have devastating effects to our water resources and natural habitats," says Dennis Dreher of the Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission and Chicago Wilderness Smith Family Fellow.

Isolated wetlands can hold large quantities of water for a long time during wet seasons, which helps to control flooding. "Studies have shown isolated wetlands, even those relatively small in size, provide essential habitat for amphibians, birds, and migrating waterfowl," says Dreher. "They also are important in transforming damaging pollutants that run off the landscape, such as phosphorus and nitrogen, thereby minimizing their adverse impacts on downstream rivers and lakes." Dreher says people need to let their local government officials know how important wetlands are.

"If these wetlands are destroyed, their habitat, water quality, and flood protection benefits will be forever lost."

People in the Chicago Wilderness can protect, and, in fact, already are protecting some of these wetlands, he says. DuPage County already has an ordinance that fully regulates wetlands, including those that are isolated. "We wrote an ordinance to protect all wetlands of any size," says Bruce Maki, regulatory services administrator for DuPage County’s stormwater management ordinance. The Army Corps agreed to allow DuPage County to assume jurisdiction over all the county’s wetlands. Since the passage of the ordinance in 1992, anyone wanting to fill in a wetland of any size in DuPage County has had to mitigate at least 1 to 1. Part of that strong ordinance was driven by the massive flood damage the county has experienced due to rapid growth and development. DuPage County had already lost 80 percent of its wetlands by the time the ordinance was written, Maki notes.

Kane County and Lake County are working to amend their countywide ordinances to include these isolated wetlands. The Lake County Stormwater Management Commission has introduced an ordinance would give the Commission jurisdiction over the county’s isolated wetlands. "We want to mimic how the Army Corps is already doing business," says Miller. Under this proposal, owners of

isolated wetlands would submit requests for permits locally instead of federally. If permits are granted, the owners would have to mitigate. The majority of people who attended the first of several public hearings in Waukegan supported the amendment to the ordinance, said Rebecca Grill, chairman of the Highland Park Environmental Commission.

Illinois legislators are trying to gain support for legislation to protect wetlands across the state. Wisconsin legislators recently voted unanimously to restore protection to isolated wetlands, although they did not act in time to save 23 acres of wetlands filled for a new truck stop. The bill, which was passed after much debate and changes, gives local governments more authority regarding filling wetlands smaller than one acre, and it gives the state authority to enter private property to investigate possible violations. Charlie Luthin, executive director of the Wisconsin Wetlands Association, organized a coalition of over 70 groups that supported saving wetlands in Wisconsin that lost federal protection.

— Sheryl De Vore

 


What is Chicago Wilderness? | Store | Donations | Contact Us | Home

Copyright 2008 Chicago Wilderness Magazine, Inc.
Revised .