|
Winter 2002
Mapping
with GIS
By
Joe Newmann
Here’s
a different way to experience a forest preserve. Instead
of the wind among the trees, you hear the hum of a computer.
I am in the Planning Department on the third floor of the
headquarters of the Forest Preserve District of Cook County.
On a computer screen is an aerial photo of Willow Springs
Woods, a 320-acre site in the Palos area. I will spend the
next hour or two helping GIS manager Irene Maue and intern
Sandy Sussman map the natural habitat communities of this
woods. Eyeing the computer screen glowing in the dark cubicle,
Sandy declares: “It gives you a totally different perspective.”
Yes, it does.
GIS stands for geographic information system. The GIS software
allows the district to integrate aerial photo data with
the on-the-ground knowledge of the district’s land management
staff and volunteer stewards like me. Dozens of stewards
are traveling to district headquarters to assist with the
mapping of the sites they work on. The goal is to standardize
and digitize habitat information for all the district’s
natural areas, especially those undergoing ecological restoration.
Where are the district’s prairies and how many acres do
they encompass? Such information is only a keystroke away
with GIS.
 |
| GIS
map shows Palos Preserve area in southwest Cook County.
Map produced by Futurity, Inc. |
On the computer screen, the main features of Willow Springs
Woods are evident. A light oval in the interior is Katydid
Marsh. Using the GIS software, Sandy encircles it and labels
it “Ma-01.” To the east, through a line of old oaks, lies
Katydid Prairie and its dense stand of big bluestem grass.
This prairie is shaped something like a staff. From its
wide “handle” in the interior, a wedge of prairie runs a
quarter mile to the west to 104th Avenue. I point out to
Sandy a white spot at the base of the prairie’s “handle.”
This is a small sedge meadow.
To the north of the prairie is an oak woodland. It has a
more mottled texture reflecting its open character. In its
best sections, Penn sedge – the woodland equivalent of a
shaggy lawn – covers the slopes. High spring finds these
slopes sprinkled with quality native wildflowers like yellow
star-grass, false dandelion, and fire pinks. Red-headed
woodpeckers wing their way overhead.
The area south and east of Katydid Marsh and Prairie is
darker on the aerial photo. This dark zone covers a third
of the site. A walk though it reveals it to be a tangled
thicket. Aggressive nonnative species dominate here. In
the district’s natural community classification system,
this is what is termed “unassociated woody growth.” Such
areas owe their existence to modern human land use practices.
Sandy labels it “UW-01” on the GIS map.
In 1821 government surveyor John Walls skirted what is today
“UW-01.” He set a post at a future property line. To aid
in identifying the location, he and his crew measured the
distance from their post to two trees. One was an oak 10
inches in diameter 77 feet away; another was an oak 15 inches
in diameter and 68 feet away. Most assuredly, this was an
open woodland where fire pinks and red-headed woodpeckers
flourished.
An old aerial photo of this area from 1938 shows a different
situation. What today we call “UW-01” was cleared from end
to end. Most likely this area had been a cattle pasture
in the years before the district acquired the property.
Katydid Marsh was open water, having been dammed and drowned.
The question remains: what will the future of this area
be? Can it be restored to a healthy native habitat? The
answer is a qualified “yes,” if the resources can be found
to eradicate the nonnatives and return the fires to the
system that once controlled the thickets. If this work is
done, future GIS maps are sure to show healthier habitat
here.

|